It’s an Odd World Out There
by Mark Reinhardt
The other day a friend of mine pointed out that we humans spend most
of our lives trying to make sense out of things that defy
rationalization. It’s our little way of trying to assert some control
over our inherently uncontrollable lives. I’d never thought about it
that way before, but I guess I have to agree. The need to make sense of
things would seem to explain everything from science to Hollywood’s
happy endings.
Of course nothing makes less sense, and defies rationalization more,
than the world of animal agriculture and meat-eating. The craziness of
it, and the way we vegetarians relate to it, never ceases to amaze me.
Here are some of the things I’ve seen in the last few weeks that have
left me dumbfounded.
If we call it "organic" it’s sure to sell
In a move that is sure to take the motoring world by storm, the
automaker Audi has announced that all the leather they use in their cars
is "organically tanned." But what does that mean, exactly? Do
they just put their leather seats out in the sun? Is
"organically-tanned" leather supposed to be safer or more
environmentally-friendly than the pesticide-laden leather other car
makers presumably use? Wouldn’t Audi’s efforts be better spent just
making cars that get decent gas mileage? If automobiles are going
"organic," will microwave ovens and toilet paper be next?
If we call it "free-range" it’s sure to sell
In North Carolina, money from the tobacco settlement is funding the
raising of "free range pork." I’m not sure what the
connection is between tobacco and meat (other than they are both
unhealthy and addictive as all get out), but I suppose one good vice
always supports another. In any event, farmers say that consumers prefer
the taste of this meat because of greater "intramuscular fat"
than on factory-farmed animals.
It should be noted that these are rich farmers. Supposedly, demand
for the "free range pork" is so strong they can make a profit
of $2,200 per hog. (Wow! I somehow don’t think their primary
motivation here is ethical.) There’s a lot more money to be made in
meat than in tobacco these days.
Just in time for the summer barbecue season
Ingrid Newkirk, the president of People for the Ethical Treatment of
Animals, has drawn up a most unusual will. Upon her death she asks that
her flesh be barbecued and her skin used to make leather products, all
in protest of the way humans treat animals. She also wants her liver to
be vacuum-packed and sent to France as a foie gras protest, and her feet
to be removed and made into umbrella stands in a mockery of what we do
to elephants.
I personally think Ms. Newkirk’s plan is incredibly imaginative and
fun. (While I’ll pass on the barbecue, I’d be proud to have one of
her feet next to my front door!) But I just can’t imagine stuffy
meat-eaters and other animal abusers appreciating the humor in this. I
can just see Mr. Meat-Eater now, rolling his eyes when he reads about
this at breakfast. ("Look at this Marge…another one of those
animal rights fanatics wants to be an umbrella stand.")
Maybe we should all have wills like this. I’m sure Hormel would be
delighted to get into the human "foie gras" business—especially
if it’s as profitable as "free range pork."
Mad dogs and Canadians
Canada’s discovery of its first cow infected with mad cow disease
made big headlines, got plenty of TV news coverage, and sent many US
stocks tumbling. The Canadian government made extraordinary efforts to
ensure that the public’s food supply wouldn’t be tainted.
Unfortunately, the governmental bureaucracy was no match for the
profit-hungry meat industry. Would this "downer of all downer"
cows go to waste instead of profit? No! The cow was
"processed" into dog food that was subsequently shipped to the
United States.
Things we don’t need science to explain
Signaling a major step forward in the advancement of human knowledge,
a study at Edinburgh University and the neighboring Roslin Institute
subjected fish to bee stings on their lips and concluded that fish can
experience pain. While animal rights supporters found this conclusion to
be rather obvious (Well, duh!), fisherpersons "carped"
at the idea. A biologist for Britain’s National Angling Alliance
expressed the opinion that fish "literally do not have the
brains" to feel pain. (A spokesfish for the test subjects countered
that anyone who thinks it’s fun to stand for hours waste-deep in a
stream doesn’t have the brains a fish is born with.)
It’s what we say, not what we do, that counts
Yogurt and ice cream maker Stonyfield Farm advertises that it
"celebrates strong women." Next fall it is sponsoring the
"Strong Woman Summit" with celebrities like Erin Brockovich.
When the irony was pointed out to the Stonyfield farmers that their
products only exist because of the rape of females of another species,
they declined to comment. Surprise, surprise.
It’s a strange world out there, and nobody’s explaining it.